Industrial Policy for AI
industrialpolicy.ai
A viewpoint-neutral organizing frame for public-policy questions affecting the productive capacity, infrastructure, investment, skills, diffusion, competition, resilience, and institutional conditions associated with AI development and adoption.
Licensing, stewardship, partnership or acquisition discussions welcome.
Why it matters
The problem this identity helps frame
Policy analysis becomes harder to audit when infrastructure, investment, adoption, regulation, labour transition, and economic outcomes are collapsed into one label or when technical feasibility is treated as proof of public benefit.
Evidence and terminology boundary
What the record supports
The OECD Recommendation on Artificial Intelligence supplies direct institutional authority for trustworthy AI principles and national-policy considerations. OECD compute work and European Commission materials provide supporting context for infrastructure, investment, skills, adoption, resilience, and measurement. None defines the LJP package or endorses LJP.
What this is not
The domain provides public technical orientation. It is not, by itself, an operational service, control plane, runtime, database, or standards authority.
Primary references
Inspect the source context
Strategic inquiry
Discuss Industrial Policy for AI
Licensing, stewardship, partnership or acquisition discussions welcome.
Discuss this identity